WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.837 --> 00:00:03.979
Hi, this is Technically Creative's Week in Review.

2
00:00:04.399 --> 00:00:08.302
This week, two of the biggest advertising companies on Earth had a fight on Instagram.

3
00:00:08.803 --> 00:00:12.486
A company announced it can put a billboard in your favorite show after the show is wrapped.

4
00:00:13.006 --> 00:00:17.550
Fox spent $22 billion on the thing you used to use to change the channel away from Fox.

5
00:00:17.710 --> 00:00:23.656
Elon Musk spent nearly half a billion dollars on an election, lost, and then joked that his space lasers must be broken.

6
00:00:23.676 --> 00:00:24.196
Yeah.

7
00:00:24.296 --> 00:00:29.197
And a professor got arrested for impeding a delivery robot because apparently the robot has rights now?

8
00:00:29.977 --> 00:00:33.358
Somewhere, a screenwriter is being told that all of this is far too fetched.

9
00:00:33.498 --> 00:00:36.499
Welcome to our Week in Review, where we'll cover all that in the next 20 minutes.

10
00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:41.540
Technically Creative is brought to you by Kubrick Labs, the AI and IT transformation partner for creative companies.

11
00:00:41.640 --> 00:00:42.820
So let's start with the news.

12
00:00:42.940 --> 00:00:47.962
Publicists and WPP are acting like the real housewives of New Jersey, and they're just fighting on Instagram.

13
00:00:47.982 --> 00:00:48.962
So that's amazing.

14
00:00:49.842 --> 00:00:53.546
WPP and Publicis are two of the biggest advertising holding companies in the world.

15
00:00:53.946 --> 00:00:58.450
The giant parent companies that own hundreds of agencies, some you've heard of, plenty you haven't.

16
00:00:59.110 --> 00:01:07.318
On WPP's earnings call on October 29th, its chief executive, Cindy Rose, was asked why WPP didn't pitch for Coca-Cola's North American media business.

17
00:01:08.080 --> 00:01:11.124
WPP had just won Koch's media almost everywhere else.

18
00:01:11.625 --> 00:01:16.672
And she said it was a tough call between six more weeks of pitching and actually doing the work that it had already won.

19
00:01:16.872 --> 00:01:17.873
And that was all fine.

20
00:01:18.614 --> 00:01:20.076
And that was all strategically fine.

21
00:01:20.177 --> 00:01:24.582
But then she had a dig at rivals who pick up big accounts without pitching at all.

22
00:01:25.083 --> 00:01:27.505
She called it a CEO handshake kind of thing.

23
00:01:27.585 --> 00:01:32.629
Publicist, which has won a run of big accounts without competitive pitching, took that personally.

24
00:01:32.829 --> 00:01:36.952
On November 5th, it posted an open letter on Instagram, and it called Cindy out.

25
00:01:37.292 --> 00:01:42.837
It said, you can't be a passionate defender of pitch culture and then plead exhaustion in the same breath.

26
00:01:43.457 --> 00:01:50.764
And then it said, if an extra six-week run was enough to sideline your teams, it's not an endurance problem, it's a capability one.

27
00:01:50.964 --> 00:01:54.347
That's one multinational corporation telling the other one to get in shape.

28
00:01:54.808 --> 00:01:55.689
And the cherry on top?

29
00:01:56.089 --> 00:02:00.853
The Coke North America pitch WPP skipped on was won by Omnicom, who took it from publicists.

30
00:02:01.714 --> 00:02:07.058
Two companies whose entire business is persuasion and the best they could manage was a subtweet on a letterhead.

31
00:02:07.198 --> 00:02:09.480
And I'm being flippant, but there's a real point here.

32
00:02:09.900 --> 00:02:14.524
Publicis in its letter made the case that the biggest accounts sure aren't one via a pitch.

33
00:02:15.064 --> 00:02:24.772
They're one on data, identity, technology, and months of diligence about whether your systems plug into the client's systems and whether they fill real strategic gaps.

34
00:02:25.572 --> 00:02:33.301
If that's right, the pitch, that strange ritual where agencies give away their best thinking for free, is losing ground to the plumbing underneath it.

35
00:02:33.341 --> 00:02:38.747
So what started as snark is actually pointing us to a very real change happening at the advertising holding company level.

36
00:02:38.787 --> 00:02:43.292
So if you're a smaller agency wondering how these deals are being made, think about it.

37
00:02:43.652 --> 00:02:44.453
Think about data.

38
00:02:44.753 --> 00:02:45.815
Think about the technology.

39
00:02:46.275 --> 00:02:49.857
On Friday, Fox closed its $22 billion acquisition of Roku.

40
00:02:50.457 --> 00:02:58.600
Fox, if you're not in the US, is the Murdoch family's American TV company, the broadcast network, Fox Sports, Fox News, and the free streaming service Tubi.

41
00:02:58.780 --> 00:03:04.762
And Roku makes streaming sticks, TVs, and software that more than 100 million households use to decide what to watch.

42
00:03:05.363 --> 00:03:06.563
The Justice Department cleared it.

43
00:03:06.683 --> 00:03:12.926
The Murdoch spent half a century building one of the great television empires, and then spent $22 billion buying the menu.

44
00:03:13.586 --> 00:03:19.893
which honestly makes perfect sense, especially since they sold the rest of Fox to Disney a year or two ago.

45
00:03:20.734 --> 00:03:25.079
In streaming, owning the shows matters less than owning the screen where people choose the shows.

46
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:31.186
Whoever controls the home screen controls what gets to be seen, and then who gets the data and who sells the ads around it.

47
00:03:31.727 --> 00:03:34.350
To get it approved, Fox has promised to keep Roku open.

48
00:03:34.690 --> 00:03:42.137
It'll carry non-Fox content, won't rig search results against rivals, and it will firewall its competitors' data for at least three years.

49
00:03:42.218 --> 00:03:46.522
And I gotta tell you, I would love to be in the room for the year four planning meeting.

50
00:03:46.860 --> 00:03:50.422
And then are you excited for me to tell you about the latest in product placement news?

51
00:03:50.983 --> 00:03:55.285
Last week, we talked about clients changing a finished music video after the director had gone home.

52
00:03:55.446 --> 00:03:57.727
This week, that power is becoming a business model.

53
00:03:57.747 --> 00:04:04.151
Two ad insertion companies, Whisper World and Rembrandt, are merging to form something called WR Labs.

54
00:04:04.311 --> 00:04:05.112
And this isn't new.

55
00:04:05.512 --> 00:04:11.456
Whisper World has spent more than a decade putting virtual billboards into TV shots after the actors have left the frame.

56
00:04:11.936 --> 00:04:14.298
And around 30,000 insertions a year.

57
00:04:15.098 --> 00:04:19.045
And the reason it works, as it's been described, is that the director doesn't need to approve it.

58
00:04:19.185 --> 00:04:22.150
Rembrandt does the exact same thing, just with AI.

59
00:04:22.431 --> 00:04:25.997
So they're a match made in heaven, or purgatory, or whatever the other one is.

60
00:04:27.215 --> 00:04:29.838
Unilever, Nestle, Procter &amp; Gamble are already buying.

61
00:04:30.398 --> 00:04:36.104
So for rights holders, old shows can earn new money, and placements can change by country or campaign.

62
00:04:36.304 --> 00:04:42.830
But what's interesting is if there's a poster on the wall of a scene about grief, that's now ad inventory sold by the week.

63
00:04:42.890 --> 00:04:51.338
And I'd be interested to know if DPs and showrunners are having to make lensing decisions based on the ability to sell inventory in a scene.

64
00:04:52.179 --> 00:05:00.463
As many of you may know, a long lens, which is where you film from quite far away, it gets the person's face in focus, but everything behind is blurry.

65
00:05:01.104 --> 00:05:07.707
I wonder if we'll start seeing a lot more things shot with shorter lenses so that the thing can be seen in the back.

66
00:05:07.767 --> 00:05:14.450
And according to a reporting on the deal, the merger also hands Rembrandt a decade of premium TV and film footage to train its AI on.

67
00:05:14.931 --> 00:05:19.353
So now your movie or show is now on an ad server and most likely in a training set.

68
00:05:19.713 --> 00:05:22.236
And then Europe decided to ask a pretty good question.

69
00:05:22.316 --> 00:05:24.799
It asked whether chatbots owe publishers money.

70
00:05:24.979 --> 00:05:31.688
On Tuesday, an advocate general at the EU's top court gave his opinion on the first case the court has taken on generative AI and copyright.

71
00:05:32.188 --> 00:05:37.555
A Hungarian publisher, like Company, sued Google after Gemini produced summaries of its articles.

72
00:05:38.965 --> 00:05:45.187
The Advocate General said that when a chatbot retrieves a publisher's article, it uses it to build an answer and serves that answer up.

73
00:05:45.487 --> 00:05:49.289
And the publisher's rights, quote-unquote, may be infringed in certain circumstances.

74
00:05:49.889 --> 00:05:55.931
On training, though, he said feeding copyrighted material into a model is permitted under Europe's text and data mining exemption.

75
00:05:56.511 --> 00:06:01.793
It's an opinion, not a ruling, but the court usually follows them, and a decision is expected in the coming months.

76
00:06:02.998 --> 00:06:06.162
For years, the fight has been about what AI was allowed to read.

77
00:06:06.522 --> 00:06:08.245
This is about what it's allowed to repeat.

78
00:06:08.445 --> 00:06:11.529
For a news publisher, the second question is the one that hits the business.

79
00:06:11.949 --> 00:06:17.516
Because a chatbot that answers with your journalism is a chatbot whose users never click through to you.

80
00:06:18.117 --> 00:06:21.718
I don't love the training half of this, but the retrieval half is a step forward.

81
00:06:22.218 --> 00:06:25.179
And then NBCUniversal is backing handheld television.

82
00:06:25.599 --> 00:06:39.823
On Tuesday, the Indian company LOLO, or LOLO, I like thinking that it's a hark back to the British LOLO, raised $80 million, co-led by NBCUniversal, at a reported valuation of around a half a billion dollars.

83
00:06:40.484 --> 00:06:44.365
LOLO makes microdramas, mostly through its app StoryTV.

84
00:06:45.145 --> 00:06:51.667
The company says it has more than 40 million monthly users across its apps, spending an average of 95 minutes a day.

85
00:06:52.308 --> 00:06:58.030
It's also built an AI production suite called Dolphin, which its founder says gives it the economics to make it.

86
00:06:58.810 --> 00:07:01.791
NBCUniversal says it'll help take the company to the U.S.

87
00:07:01.971 --> 00:07:04.612
So Hollywood spent a century making the screen bigger.

88
00:07:04.712 --> 00:07:11.155
Widescreen, Cinemascope, 70mm, IMAX, and the massive thing that's in my living room right now.

89
00:07:11.895 --> 00:07:17.457
But one of the fastest-growing entertainment formats on Earth is designed to be watched while you're queuing for coffee.

90
00:07:18.118 --> 00:07:21.359
For producers, it's the counterfactual question in its purest form.

91
00:07:21.899 --> 00:07:24.961
Micro dramas on this scale aren't replacing a prestige drama.

92
00:07:25.321 --> 00:07:29.022
At this price per episode, most of them wouldn't even exist at all without cheap production.

93
00:07:29.222 --> 00:07:32.304
So it goes to a thesis we've had on this podcast for quite some time.

94
00:07:32.364 --> 00:07:36.786
Yes, it's taking attention, but it isn't removing opportunities.

95
00:07:36.886 --> 00:07:40.007
And then I've been promising myself to do more news from the world of art.

96
00:07:41.453 --> 00:07:42.674
And this is a really good one.

97
00:07:43.054 --> 00:07:46.496
AI is selling Aboriginal art without Aboriginal artists.

98
00:07:47.156 --> 00:08:03.104
Sally Scales, a Pintjajajara artist, excuse me if I butchered that, who chairs the National Gallery of Australia's First Nations Advisory Group, told The Guardian this week that AI is turning First Nations art into, in her words, Timu Slop.

99
00:08:03.905 --> 00:08:10.488
AI-generated designs that imitate Aboriginal art are turning up for sale online with no connection to any artist or community.

100
00:08:11.313 --> 00:08:12.774
There's no joke in the harm here.

101
00:08:13.134 --> 00:08:18.277
These styles carry family lineage, country, and knowledge that copyright was never designed to protect.

102
00:08:18.877 --> 00:08:21.899
If there's anything absurd, it's the business model around it.

103
00:08:22.659 --> 00:08:30.344
We built technology that can imitate any artistic tradition on Earth, and now it's printing a culture it doesn't understand onto cheap phone cases.

104
00:08:31.264 --> 00:08:35.827
It's an indictment of the marketplaces, it's an indictment of AI, it's an indictment of copyright.

105
00:08:36.874 --> 00:08:38.776
It's an indictment of what we're doing to artists.

106
00:08:39.236 --> 00:08:44.862
And anyone in designer retail who says, well, the AI made it, that doesn't settle where it came from.

107
00:08:45.502 --> 00:08:46.923
And that doesn't settle who it's hurting.

108
00:08:46.963 --> 00:08:50.667
So yeah, more from the world of art, because these sorts of questions are really interesting.

109
00:08:52.095 --> 00:08:54.717
Runway's AI actor can also join your Zoom.

110
00:08:54.938 --> 00:09:03.325
Runway, the AI video company, published research this week on its interactive characters, which turn a single image into a video character you can talk to in real time.

111
00:09:03.526 --> 00:09:07.589
It's a 57 billion parameter model generating 24 frames a second.

112
00:09:07.769 --> 00:09:14.295
And every live conversation runs on four NVIDIA H100 chips that cost tens of thousands of dollars of each.

113
00:09:15.176 --> 00:09:16.899
It's genuinely impressive engineering.

114
00:09:17.199 --> 00:09:20.824
It's also a feature where a character can join your Zoom, Google Meet, or Teams call.

115
00:09:20.944 --> 00:09:28.394
So Silicon Valley finally invented an actor who's not temperamental, is available around the clock, never needs a trailer, and can sit in on your Monday meeting.

116
00:09:29.275 --> 00:09:31.999
I wonder if Hollywood's wondering, why didn't we think of that?

117
00:09:33.841 --> 00:09:36.243
And then a professor took on the robots.

118
00:09:36.423 --> 00:09:41.768
Carolyn Marvin is a 78-year-old retired communications professor from the University of Pennsylvania.

119
00:09:42.228 --> 00:09:47.733
And she's been in the news again this week for standing in front of an Uber Eats delivery robot on Philadelphia sidewalks.

120
00:09:48.133 --> 00:09:52.477
In October, police handcuffed her, put her in a squad car, and cited her for disorderly conduct.

121
00:09:52.997 --> 00:10:01.511
Her argument is that private companies shouldn't get to take over public pavements with their machines, and that protesting corporate behavior in public spaces is her First Amendment right.

122
00:10:02.152 --> 00:10:03.875
I was impeding a machine, she says.

123
00:10:05.217 --> 00:10:06.860
She's also said she'll keep doing it.

124
00:10:08.223 --> 00:10:09.364
Here's the detail I love.

125
00:10:09.764 --> 00:10:14.168
Since 2020, Pennsylvania law has classified these robots as pedestrians.

126
00:10:14.528 --> 00:10:18.831
So legally, this was one pedestrian refusing to let another pedestrian pass.

127
00:10:18.931 --> 00:10:28.959
And I just think of all the billions that have been spent on computer vision and autonomous navigation, and that it's met its match from a retired professor who knows her constitutional rights.

128
00:10:29.059 --> 00:10:33.903
So this story delights me, except for the fact that she was thrown into a squad car and had handcuffs on.

129
00:10:33.923 --> 00:10:36.905
But it is quite charming, and I wish her all the luck in the way.

130
00:10:36.945 --> 00:10:51.876
And I don't think this will be the flashpoint for robots' rights versus human rights, but I think it is telling that because these robots are owned by very large corporations, that it might actually be another front in the discussion about corporate rights versus human rights.

131
00:10:52.678 --> 00:10:56.907
And then the last bit of news I'll talk about is that the Cybertruck production is being wound down.

132
00:10:57.468 --> 00:11:01.736
I presume it's because the Cybertruck can't do a backflip, and that's...

133
00:11:02.918 --> 00:11:05.419
the new standard for creating cars at Tesla.

134
00:11:06.199 --> 00:11:07.720
And so that was the news last week.

135
00:11:07.920 --> 00:11:09.601
But I think there's a much bigger story.

136
00:11:09.741 --> 00:11:14.423
I'm sure you've all seen the blue wave that happened during America's elections last week.

137
00:11:15.043 --> 00:11:18.485
And I think the biggest story of the week didn't look like a technology story.

138
00:11:18.965 --> 00:11:20.245
It looked like a political one.

139
00:11:20.645 --> 00:11:24.207
And so the title of this episode is, what are we going to do with all this cloud?

140
00:11:24.667 --> 00:11:26.088
And that's a real question for me.

141
00:11:26.928 --> 00:11:31.810
On Tuesday, Democrats took control of both houses of Congress and picked up a handful of governorships.

142
00:11:32.311 --> 00:11:34.031
You'll hear it explained a few different ways.

143
00:11:34.371 --> 00:11:36.432
The main one was that it was about the cost of living.

144
00:11:36.813 --> 00:11:41.755
In the final Reuters poll before the vote, nearly half of registered voters called it their top issue.

145
00:11:42.235 --> 00:11:46.199
And about half of Americans say that their finances had gotten worse since January last year.

146
00:11:46.219 --> 00:11:48.060
It was also about billionaires.

147
00:11:48.201 --> 00:11:57.229
In the same poll, 93% of Democrats and 71% of Republicans said that it's inappropriate for billionaires to spend tens of millions of dollars to sway elections.

148
00:11:57.349 --> 00:12:00.492
And a bit more surprisingly, it was also about data centers.

149
00:12:01.673 --> 00:12:03.294
The AP went through the results.

150
00:12:03.655 --> 00:12:14.183
Of the 34 winning candidates for governor in races it had called, 32 support stronger regulation or restrictions on data centers, and 12 support bans or moratoriums.

151
00:12:14.624 --> 00:12:21.069
In local referendums on data centers, restrictions passed in 44 of the 45 votes where counting was finished.

152
00:12:21.730 --> 00:12:25.373
About three-quarters of voters said they'd oppose a new data center in their community.

153
00:12:25.997 --> 00:12:27.258
And it crossed party lines.

154
00:12:27.699 --> 00:12:34.225
One of the people who started a protest group in Lubbock, Texas, it was a Republican, and she said the data centers were on the ballot.

155
00:12:35.206 --> 00:12:42.513
Most coverage is treating those three separate stories as an economy story, an inequality story, and a weird local planning story.

156
00:12:43.013 --> 00:12:46.977
But I think they're one story, and it's one big technology story.

157
00:12:47.057 --> 00:12:48.038
So let's start with the money.

158
00:12:49.301 --> 00:12:54.143
Tech didn't cause your grocery bill to go up, but it is where new fortunes are being made.

159
00:12:54.924 --> 00:13:04.048
15 of the 34 newcomers to this year's Forbes 400 made their money in tech, and they account for nearly 60% of the newcomers' combined wealth.

160
00:13:04.828 --> 00:13:09.292
Forbes counted 45 new AI billionaires in this year to March alone.

161
00:13:09.472 --> 00:13:11.154
Now, a lot of that wealth is just on paper.

162
00:13:11.314 --> 00:13:16.999
It's shares in companies valued on what investors expect them to earn one day, not on what they earn now.

163
00:13:17.679 --> 00:13:20.082
That's the K-shaped economy in one sentence.

164
00:13:20.602 --> 00:13:23.805
If you own assets, the AI boom has been one of the best years of your life.

165
00:13:24.265 --> 00:13:28.229
If you're paying rent and buying groceries on a salary, you mostly get the price rises.

166
00:13:29.109 --> 00:13:30.089
Then the data centers.

167
00:13:30.649 --> 00:13:34.830
The same boom that's minting those fortunes needs somewhere to physically happen.

168
00:13:35.170 --> 00:13:40.732
And that's a very large, very loud warehouse that drinks water, eats electricity, and needs a new substation.

169
00:13:41.372 --> 00:13:42.612
The wealth goes national.

170
00:13:42.752 --> 00:13:43.952
The costs stay local.

171
00:13:44.233 --> 00:13:54.215
Texas elected its first Democratic agriculture commissioner since 1986, Clayton Tucker, who said fighting data centers was critical to his win because his ranchers were worried about water.

172
00:13:55.124 --> 00:13:56.005
Then the politics.

173
00:13:56.365 --> 00:14:03.692
In the state Senate race, Republican Ken Paxton wanted to make Texas the center of America's AI industry through rapid data center construction.

174
00:14:04.253 --> 00:14:06.975
Democrat James Tallarico campaigned for tighter rules.

175
00:14:07.676 --> 00:14:19.147
Elon Musk spent nearly half a billion dollars backing Republicans this cycle, and a Republican super PAC put $158 million of his money into supporting Paxton in September alone.

176
00:14:19.167 --> 00:14:19.347
Right.

177
00:14:19.707 --> 00:14:20.587
Tallarico won.

178
00:14:20.707 --> 00:14:25.590
The morning after, Musk posted, guess my election-interfering space lasers didn't work this time.

179
00:14:26.030 --> 00:14:33.633
And then, data centers in space are looking pretty appealing right now, which, to be fair, is the most honest thing anyone in the industry has said all week.

180
00:14:34.674 --> 00:14:36.655
If your neighbors won't have it, put it in orbit.

181
00:14:37.642 --> 00:14:41.444
Musk became a trillionaire in June when SpaceX went public.

182
00:14:41.564 --> 00:14:49.868
So $445 million for him is the same share of his net worth as $445 is to someone with a million dollars worth.

183
00:14:49.988 --> 00:14:52.369
It tells you the scale of what we're talking about.

184
00:14:52.769 --> 00:14:57.431
I know we look at that and we could be like, can you believe that Elon Musk is flaunting his wealth like that?

185
00:14:57.611 --> 00:14:59.754
I've given $450 to candidates.

186
00:15:00.375 --> 00:15:01.897
It didn't feel like a huge deal.

187
00:15:02.418 --> 00:15:05.602
And that's the level we're dealing with when we're talking about Elon Musk.

188
00:15:05.662 --> 00:15:06.924
And it shows the scale.

189
00:15:07.104 --> 00:15:12.852
Because a political campaign for the richest man on Earth costs about what a nice dinner costs a millionaire.

190
00:15:13.493 --> 00:15:14.253
So put it together.

191
00:15:14.613 --> 00:15:22.135
Technology is creating the new fortunes, needs the new buildings, and is funding the new political spending, all while most voters feel poorer.

192
00:15:22.275 --> 00:15:24.515
So this isn't three stories to me, it's one loop.

193
00:15:24.655 --> 00:15:26.576
But here's where I think a lot of the anger goes wrong.

194
00:15:27.016 --> 00:15:34.417
On Friday, protesters broke into a Microsoft data center construction site in Amsterdam, climbed a crane, and set off flares.

195
00:15:34.837 --> 00:15:37.798
Part of the campaign planned across 15 European countries.

196
00:15:38.238 --> 00:15:42.239
One of them told reporters, the only thing this will be used for is AI slop.

197
00:15:42.879 --> 00:15:43.520
It isn't, though.

198
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:50.505
Data centers run your email, your cloud storage, your streaming, your render farm, your hospital records, and yes, your AI tools.

199
00:15:50.945 --> 00:15:56.409
And even the AI part isn't necessarily about all the chatbots making pictures of the Pope in a puffer jacket.

200
00:15:57.110 --> 00:15:58.311
Think about just your email.

201
00:15:58.771 --> 00:16:09.179
If AI means everyone now answers all of their emails instead of just 10% of them, and every one of those emails is a little bit longer, that's an enormous amount of extra data that has to be stored somewhere.

202
00:16:09.839 --> 00:16:13.161
You could call a lot of that slop, obviously, but it's slop you need.

203
00:16:13.601 --> 00:16:19.985
The day you go looking for an email exchange with somebody and it isn't there, you'll be furious, because that data has to live somewhere.

204
00:16:20.766 --> 00:16:23.127
And the rest of the world isn't pausing to think about it.

205
00:16:23.808 --> 00:16:33.133
China is building data centers across its cheap energy rural provinces at astonishing speed, with a plan worth about $300 billion over five years.

206
00:16:33.834 --> 00:16:38.317
So when some Democrats started calling for a national data center moratorium the day after the election—

207
00:16:39.117 --> 00:16:40.738
I do think that's the wrong answer.

208
00:16:41.418 --> 00:16:43.619
Stopping building doesn't make the demand go away.

209
00:16:43.719 --> 00:16:47.021
It just moves the computing somewhere else, probably overseas.

210
00:16:47.161 --> 00:16:48.841
But these are also two different stories.

211
00:16:49.222 --> 00:16:56.505
We need data centers is one thing, but that doesn't mean that we need this data center here on these terms and with your grid paying for it.

212
00:16:57.065 --> 00:17:03.408
Those are different arguments, and the industry has been getting away with treating them as one binary choice, data center or no data center.

213
00:17:03.968 --> 00:17:05.429
There are better ways to do this.

214
00:17:06.129 --> 00:17:16.475
Amazon and Viola are building a system in Mississippi that will cool a downer center with treated municipal wastewater, reusing more than 80 million gallons a year instead of pulling it from the local supply.

215
00:17:17.035 --> 00:17:19.017
You can build away from where people live.

216
00:17:19.377 --> 00:17:20.898
You can pay for your own power.

217
00:17:21.238 --> 00:17:24.039
Almost nobody seems to be fighting for that middle ground.

218
00:17:24.520 --> 00:17:26.701
It's either build anywhere or build nothing.

219
00:17:27.938 --> 00:17:30.039
This week, for the first time, somebody flinched.

220
00:17:30.559 --> 00:17:35.342
On Thursday, two days after the election, OpenAI published what it calls a community compact.

221
00:17:35.762 --> 00:17:41.025
It says OpenAI will cover the energy costs of the infrastructure it builds rather than passing them on to the public.

222
00:17:41.405 --> 00:17:43.386
It'll warn communities about the impacts.

223
00:17:43.586 --> 00:17:53.451
It'll publish reports on the jobs it expects to create and stop using non-disclosure agreements with public officials, which tells you that they were using non-disclosure agreements with public officials.

224
00:17:55.172 --> 00:17:57.513
OpenAI calls them compute campuses now.

225
00:17:58.637 --> 00:18:00.819
And I'm sure you'll all feel much better about that.

226
00:18:01.620 --> 00:18:06.024
Two days after the data centers lost an election, they got rebranded as universities.

227
00:18:06.845 --> 00:18:08.687
These are promises and they need checking.

228
00:18:09.087 --> 00:18:15.673
But paying for your own electricity bill and telling the neighbors what you're building is a far better place to start than either extreme.

229
00:18:15.934 --> 00:18:20.538
If any of you know me, you'll know that I'm very seldom on the side of open AI and it's making me uncomfortable.

230
00:18:21.800 --> 00:18:25.342
But if you make films and ads or music or books, this is your problem too.

231
00:18:25.522 --> 00:18:32.967
If these buildings get harder to build, I think creative businesses will feel it in what they pay for rendering, storage, AI tools well before most people notice.

232
00:18:34.688 --> 00:18:37.750
The question was never whether this technology can create enormous wealth.

233
00:18:37.810 --> 00:18:38.690
It plainly can.

234
00:18:39.111 --> 00:18:42.132
The question is whether the people who live next to the machine see any of it.

235
00:18:42.793 --> 00:18:47.376
On Tuesday, a lot of them answered, and I think everybody needs to pay attention to that.

236
00:18:47.576 --> 00:18:51.358
The question is, can we now have a really adult, nonpartisan debate about it?

237
00:18:52.640 --> 00:18:53.060
I doubt it.

238
00:18:54.721 --> 00:18:56.482
So yeah, the cloud has to live somewhere.

239
00:18:56.502 --> 00:18:58.764
It turns out that somewhere has a vote.

240
00:18:59.604 --> 00:19:00.445
So thanks for listening.

241
00:19:00.705 --> 00:19:08.390
Tomorrow's interview episode is with Douglas Clark, who's a wonderful engineer who's made a tool that helps actors with casting and self-tapes at home.

242
00:19:08.870 --> 00:19:12.312
Makes them feel a lot more part of the process and activates it a little bit.

243
00:19:14.033 --> 00:19:19.717
You know, not every role is flying Jacob Adolorty and Jack Loudon out to test for it.

244
00:19:20.537 --> 00:19:21.958
A lot of people are doing this at home.

245
00:19:22.038 --> 00:19:25.922
And so this is a great tool that's going to help them do that and turn in better performances.

246
00:19:26.483 --> 00:19:28.825
So thank you so much for listening, and we'll see you next week.
