WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.880
Welcome back everyone to the game in our audio first series.

2
00:00:03.880 --> 00:00:05.520
I've been making these as audio,

3
00:00:05.520 --> 00:00:06.640
y'all have been telling me that you like it,

4
00:00:06.640 --> 00:00:08.160
so I will keep doing it.

5
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:10.640
And today I want to talk about scaling deliverables.

6
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:12.360
All right, so this is a follow up

7
00:00:12.360 --> 00:00:15.040
on the unscalable value scalable kind of continuum

8
00:00:15.040 --> 00:00:15.880
that I was talking about before,

9
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:16.680
but I have a different framework

10
00:00:16.680 --> 00:00:18.240
that I want to introduce to you today.

11
00:00:18.240 --> 00:00:20.440
I have the easy to sell hard to fill continuum

12
00:00:20.440 --> 00:00:24.120
that exists, but I wanted to kind of zoom in on that

13
00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:27.680
and walk you through two versions of scaling.

14
00:00:27.720 --> 00:00:30.080
This may be a shorter pod,

15
00:00:30.080 --> 00:00:31.320
but I think for the right person,

16
00:00:31.320 --> 00:00:32.440
it may be game changing.

17
00:00:32.440 --> 00:00:35.320
So let's say that you have a service business,

18
00:00:35.320 --> 00:00:36.720
which 78% of businesses are.

19
00:00:36.720 --> 00:00:38.240
And if you're a software's a service,

20
00:00:38.240 --> 00:00:39.960
then you still deliver the same things that a service does.

21
00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:42.360
You just do it with a machine, right?

22
00:00:42.360 --> 00:00:43.280
If you start in the beginning,

23
00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:46.240
which many people do as one-on-one at whatever they do,

24
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:48.840
then there are ways that you can scale it.

25
00:00:48.840 --> 00:00:51.040
And there are basically two continuums

26
00:00:51.040 --> 00:00:53.280
that you can quote scale.

27
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:55.640
So one is that you keep doing the thing,

28
00:00:55.640 --> 00:00:59.880
but you increase the ratio of you to customers.

29
00:00:59.880 --> 00:01:02.080
So you go from being a one-on-one person

30
00:01:02.080 --> 00:01:03.320
to be a one-on-four person,

31
00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:04.480
to a one-on-10 person,

32
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:06.200
to a one-on-100 person,

33
00:01:06.200 --> 00:01:08.280
to a one-on-1000 person.

34
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:11.520
And in those settings, you can also change the medium.

35
00:01:11.520 --> 00:01:13.960
So it's like, I can be one-on-one in person

36
00:01:13.960 --> 00:01:15.960
versus one-on-one remote.

37
00:01:15.960 --> 00:01:17.800
And I could change the one-on-four in person

38
00:01:17.800 --> 00:01:18.760
versus one-on-one remote,

39
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:20.400
and that might be more valuable.

40
00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.800
And I could go from one-on-one to 100 remote

41
00:01:23.800 --> 00:01:25.400
to one-on-100 in person.

42
00:01:25.400 --> 00:01:27.320
That would probably be more valuable.

43
00:01:27.320 --> 00:01:29.040
And so there are other variables that you can play with

44
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:30.440
beyond just your ratio,

45
00:01:30.440 --> 00:01:33.400
but the ratio is probably the most significant one

46
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:35.000
that will change as you scale.

47
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:39.680
One version of that is just more fractionalized access to you.

48
00:01:39.680 --> 00:01:41.640
The alternative version is the version

49
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:43.120
where you add bodies.

50
00:01:43.120 --> 00:01:45.760
So that's where you take what you are good at,

51
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:48.360
and then you try and break it into constituent parts.

52
00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:50.040
And so when you do your process,

53
00:01:50.040 --> 00:01:51.400
whether it's you crack people's backs,

54
00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:54.240
you fix, you know, you're some expert at something,

55
00:01:54.240 --> 00:01:56.240
you have something that you're very good at.

56
00:01:56.240 --> 00:01:58.400
But fundamentally, there are just behaviors

57
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:00.320
that are based on different conditions.

58
00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:02.200
And so when you see X, you think Y,

59
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:04.160
when you see Z, you think W, or you do W,

60
00:02:04.160 --> 00:02:05.480
or you recommend W.

61
00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:07.840
The work of creating the scalable solution

62
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:12.600
that does not require you requires you to break it into parts,

63
00:02:12.600 --> 00:02:15.400
and then drill other people on how to do

64
00:02:15.400 --> 00:02:16.920
each of those individual parts.

65
00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:18.200
And sometimes it's multiple people

66
00:02:18.200 --> 00:02:20.000
who do multiple parts of a singular process

67
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:22.880
that you on your own could do on your own.

68
00:02:22.880 --> 00:02:27.520
The second path creates the more sellable business.

69
00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:29.800
That is what creates a set that other people

70
00:02:29.800 --> 00:02:31.160
could eventually buy from you.

71
00:02:31.160 --> 00:02:32.800
And if you look at the ultimate versions of these,

72
00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:34.480
you look at, you know, like consulting

73
00:02:34.480 --> 00:02:36.200
as a very, quote, unscalable business,

74
00:02:36.200 --> 00:02:37.360
I put quotes on that.

75
00:02:37.360 --> 00:02:40.600
But the people who say that also don't even like recognize

76
00:02:40.600 --> 00:02:43.720
that like McKinsey is a multinational,

77
00:02:43.720 --> 00:02:45.320
massive multi-billion dollar company

78
00:02:45.320 --> 00:02:46.920
that's a consulting firm, right?

79
00:02:46.920 --> 00:02:49.680
Accenture, same thing, Bane, same thing,

80
00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:52.440
Gartner, same thing, PWC, which is accounting,

81
00:02:52.440 --> 00:02:54.560
same thing, Urson Young, same thing.

82
00:02:54.560 --> 00:02:55.800
So it's like we have this idea is like,

83
00:02:55.800 --> 00:02:57.720
I don't think this, of course, is scalable,

84
00:02:57.720 --> 00:02:59.080
it just takes work.

85
00:02:59.080 --> 00:03:02.040
Like we have cities in the middle of the ocean.

86
00:03:02.040 --> 00:03:03.840
We can do this, we can hire someone

87
00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:06.240
and teach them how to do the same thing as us.

88
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:08.880
Those are basically the two paths that you have.

89
00:03:08.880 --> 00:03:11.440
You have a more fractionalized access to you,

90
00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:13.720
or you teach other people to do the same thing you do

91
00:03:13.720 --> 00:03:16.520
until eventually a process of people put together

92
00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:17.560
creates the aqua.

93
00:03:17.560 --> 00:03:20.480
Now there's a third bucket that I don't talk about as much,

94
00:03:20.480 --> 00:03:22.640
but is absolutely a solution,

95
00:03:22.640 --> 00:03:24.520
kind of a hybrid between these things,

96
00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:26.000
which is, and this is, I would say,

97
00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:28.960
more accurately descriptor of what Bane McKinsey

98
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:31.600
all of these kind of like big firms do,

99
00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:34.200
which is that they have a hierarchy

100
00:03:34.200 --> 00:03:37.640
of junior, middle level, and senior management.

101
00:03:37.640 --> 00:03:40.000
And by doing that, that gives a career path

102
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:42.520
for the younger guys to go to the senior management level.

103
00:03:42.520 --> 00:03:45.560
And the senior managers give that little bit of credibility

104
00:03:45.560 --> 00:03:47.040
to whatever the work, the analysts

105
00:03:47.040 --> 00:03:48.600
and the middle level guys did,

106
00:03:48.600 --> 00:03:49.840
whether it's investment banking,

107
00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:51.960
or like I said, consulting or accounting,

108
00:03:51.960 --> 00:03:53.080
it's still knowledge work.

109
00:03:53.080 --> 00:03:54.280
Same thing works in law firms.

110
00:03:54.280 --> 00:03:55.800
They have senior guys and they've got junior guys.

111
00:03:55.800 --> 00:03:57.560
The junior guys are doing most of the grunt work,

112
00:03:57.560 --> 00:03:59.080
but the senior guys are the ones that sign off

113
00:03:59.080 --> 00:03:59.920
and say that it's good.

114
00:03:59.920 --> 00:04:01.880
They're the ones who risk their reputation

115
00:04:01.880 --> 00:04:02.720
and their reputation in the firm,

116
00:04:02.720 --> 00:04:03.720
whereas the smaller guys actually do

117
00:04:03.720 --> 00:04:05.200
the majority of the leg work.

118
00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:06.440
And so this is fairly typical

119
00:04:06.440 --> 00:04:08.880
within most kind of knowledge-based businesses.

120
00:04:08.880 --> 00:04:12.320
The difference there is that it's actually many to one.

121
00:04:12.320 --> 00:04:13.600
And so I'm talking about scaling to deliverable

122
00:04:13.600 --> 00:04:14.920
of like it's one on one.

123
00:04:14.920 --> 00:04:17.480
A higher version of that is many to one,

124
00:04:17.480 --> 00:04:19.960
which is you basically pull yourself out

125
00:04:19.960 --> 00:04:21.800
of doing all of the work,

126
00:04:21.800 --> 00:04:24.680
but you have other people that do parts of the work

127
00:04:24.680 --> 00:04:26.320
and then you sign off on it.

128
00:04:26.320 --> 00:04:27.520
And so this allows you to kind of get

129
00:04:27.520 --> 00:04:28.600
a little bit of the best of both worlds,

130
00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:29.440
rather than being like, okay,

131
00:04:29.440 --> 00:04:31.520
I can only run webinars to a thousand people, right?

132
00:04:31.520 --> 00:04:33.280
So that's like kind of a third path

133
00:04:33.280 --> 00:04:35.120
that you can have along this continuum.

134
00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:36.680
Now, if you're like, okay,

135
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:39.080
well, I'm stuck at one to one right now.

136
00:04:39.080 --> 00:04:40.240
What do I do next?

137
00:04:40.240 --> 00:04:41.520
It actually, in my opinion,

138
00:04:41.520 --> 00:04:44.040
depends working backwards from your goal.

139
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:47.000
If you go fractionalize access to you,

140
00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:49.760
in my opinion, you will make more money.

141
00:04:49.760 --> 00:04:51.800
You will make more money in terms of income.

142
00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:53.880
Because what happens is you'll create this virtuous loopable,

143
00:04:53.880 --> 00:04:56.080
it'll force you to just get better and better

144
00:04:56.080 --> 00:04:58.120
at doing whatever your skill is.

145
00:04:58.120 --> 00:04:59.880
Look at like a Tony Robbins, right?

146
00:04:59.880 --> 00:05:01.680
He was started, you know, one on one,

147
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:03.120
and he kept scaling up and scaling up.

148
00:05:03.120 --> 00:05:05.440
And now he does global events,

149
00:05:05.440 --> 00:05:07.840
you know, remotely with 10,000 people,

150
00:05:07.840 --> 00:05:11.440
50,000 people at once, but he's still him.

151
00:05:11.440 --> 00:05:13.120
And so trying to transfer the skill set

152
00:05:13.120 --> 00:05:13.960
that is Tony Robbins,

153
00:05:13.960 --> 00:05:15.760
because he is absolutely skill set.

154
00:05:15.760 --> 00:05:18.440
He just has a lot of skills that take time to learn

155
00:05:18.440 --> 00:05:20.440
that it's very difficult for other people to replicate.

156
00:05:20.440 --> 00:05:22.800
He could have a number of people

157
00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:23.840
that run the Tony process.

158
00:05:23.840 --> 00:05:25.000
And I think he does,

159
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:27.840
but I would bet dollars to donuts

160
00:05:27.840 --> 00:05:29.000
that the largest revenue driver

161
00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:31.080
and specifically value driver and brand driver

162
00:05:31.080 --> 00:05:35.200
of his business is fractionalized access to him.

163
00:05:35.200 --> 00:05:36.680
It's where you consume the stuff

164
00:05:36.680 --> 00:05:38.640
that he does live one to many,

165
00:05:38.640 --> 00:05:41.160
or products that he's recorded in the past

166
00:05:41.160 --> 00:05:44.520
where it's still him with his star power, again, one to many.

167
00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:47.760
Now, the downside of that is you have key man risk, right?

168
00:05:47.760 --> 00:05:49.040
Which is that if you leave,

169
00:05:49.040 --> 00:05:50.480
then the business doesn't work.

170
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:53.040
But I want to push back on this a lot,

171
00:05:53.040 --> 00:05:54.120
or a little bit at least,

172
00:05:54.120 --> 00:05:54.800
for those of you who are like,

173
00:05:54.800 --> 00:05:56.480
well, I want to build a scale blast set.

174
00:05:56.480 --> 00:05:59.120
Well, and of course, it sounds like running coming from me

175
00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:00.800
for a person who sold one of these businesses.

176
00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:03.520
But if you plan on working for the rest of your life,

177
00:06:03.520 --> 00:06:05.200
which you probably do,

178
00:06:05.200 --> 00:06:07.360
it might be worth extending the time rise

179
00:06:07.360 --> 00:06:09.160
and getting better.

180
00:06:09.160 --> 00:06:10.640
The scaling the deliverable part of it

181
00:06:10.640 --> 00:06:12.960
of going one to many will force you to keep up loving.

182
00:06:12.960 --> 00:06:14.200
You see, go from one on one to one on four.

183
00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:15.200
Go from one on four to one on 10.

184
00:06:15.200 --> 00:06:16.440
You go from one on 10 to one on 20,

185
00:06:16.440 --> 00:06:19.120
one on 20 to one to 100, one to 100, one to one to 1000, right?

186
00:06:19.120 --> 00:06:20.240
And at each of those levels,

187
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:23.600
you'll have to develop more varied and deeper skills.

188
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:26.040
And so you'll actually just keep getting better.

189
00:06:26.040 --> 00:06:28.440
And I've just never been against getting better

190
00:06:28.440 --> 00:06:30.240
at anything, right?

191
00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:32.200
If you follow along that path

192
00:06:32.200 --> 00:06:34.320
because it's fractionalized access to you,

193
00:06:34.320 --> 00:06:36.520
you will gain the benefit of having many, many customers,

194
00:06:36.520 --> 00:06:38.840
but very low or light delivery

195
00:06:38.840 --> 00:06:40.320
in terms of number of head count.

196
00:06:40.320 --> 00:06:42.680
And so you'll be able to make significantly more profit

197
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:43.520
in general.

198
00:06:43.520 --> 00:06:45.520
You will be able to live the whole time as you grow,

199
00:06:45.520 --> 00:06:47.520
being able to reinvest lots of that cash

200
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:50.440
into other things, including developing more skills.

201
00:06:50.440 --> 00:06:52.280
But if you do wanna build the,

202
00:06:52.280 --> 00:06:54.360
I wanna sell this thing, path,

203
00:06:54.360 --> 00:06:58.120
then I would encourage you to either go the many to one path

204
00:06:58.120 --> 00:07:00.480
as an intermediary, which is you chunk it out

205
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:01.640
and then you give pieces of it,

206
00:07:01.640 --> 00:07:02.800
rather than saying,

207
00:07:02.800 --> 00:07:04.120
and this is where I think a lot of people make them stay,

208
00:07:04.120 --> 00:07:06.080
and I've really yet to see someone succeed with this

209
00:07:06.080 --> 00:07:09.400
at scale, which is I'm just gonna hire people

210
00:07:09.400 --> 00:07:11.480
and teach them everything that I do.

211
00:07:11.480 --> 00:07:13.480
Because it's just really unlikely

212
00:07:13.480 --> 00:07:15.400
that if you're really good at this thing,

213
00:07:15.400 --> 00:07:16.840
if you're really good at it,

214
00:07:16.840 --> 00:07:19.080
it's probably taking you some time to get really good at it.

215
00:07:19.080 --> 00:07:21.000
And if you can teach somebody else to do the thing

216
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:24.440
that you do in like a weekend or a week

217
00:07:24.440 --> 00:07:25.960
because you're onboarding them,

218
00:07:25.960 --> 00:07:29.560
then you're probably not teaching them fully how to do,

219
00:07:29.560 --> 00:07:31.880
because there's probably other ancillary skills

220
00:07:31.880 --> 00:07:34.200
and behaviors that you do that make you the star

221
00:07:34.200 --> 00:07:37.520
or the authority of your expert that they don't have.

222
00:07:37.520 --> 00:07:39.040
And so you end up really just selling

223
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:41.120
a watered down or diluted version,

224
00:07:41.120 --> 00:07:44.320
and I would personally rather sell a fractionalized version

225
00:07:44.320 --> 00:07:46.520
rather than a diluted version.

226
00:07:46.520 --> 00:07:49.880
I'd rather sell you a smaller cup of milk,

227
00:07:49.880 --> 00:07:52.120
but the milk is still just as good,

228
00:07:52.120 --> 00:07:54.880
then sell you a cup of the same size milk

229
00:07:54.880 --> 00:07:56.720
that I added a bunch of water to.

230
00:07:56.720 --> 00:07:58.680
That's fundamentally the difference.

231
00:07:58.680 --> 00:08:03.080
And in order to sell the milk in as many glasses

232
00:08:03.080 --> 00:08:05.760
at scale and have the sellable business,

233
00:08:05.760 --> 00:08:09.520
then I think it's where you create the partner structure,

234
00:08:09.520 --> 00:08:10.720
the firm structure,

235
00:08:10.720 --> 00:08:12.680
that all of these professional services businesses

236
00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:14.280
oftentimes end up in,

237
00:08:14.280 --> 00:08:17.000
which is you have these layers of people

238
00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:18.840
who develop more and more skills over time

239
00:08:18.840 --> 00:08:21.320
until they eventually over years

240
00:08:21.320 --> 00:08:23.440
can become a senior partner, not weeks.

241
00:08:23.440 --> 00:08:25.080
When you're like, oh, I got an onboard a coach,

242
00:08:25.080 --> 00:08:27.680
oh, I got an onboard another account representative.

243
00:08:27.680 --> 00:08:29.320
If what you do is actually valuable,

244
00:08:29.320 --> 00:08:31.000
then you probably can't teach it in the week.

245
00:08:31.000 --> 00:08:32.840
And I think that's the TLDR of that.

246
00:08:32.840 --> 00:08:34.160
Now, can you sell it?

247
00:08:34.160 --> 00:08:36.040
Sure, you can sell people on it,

248
00:08:36.040 --> 00:08:37.440
but they're not gonna stay.

249
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:39.440
And I think that's really what this comes down to.

250
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:41.000
If I'm looking at my business

251
00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:43.400
and I'm like, what do I want my next step to be?

252
00:08:43.400 --> 00:08:45.240
If I wanna sell this thing immediately,

253
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:47.920
then I'm probably gonna look at the partner path

254
00:08:47.920 --> 00:08:50.520
of breaking this up and having grunt guys

255
00:08:50.520 --> 00:08:52.480
do a lot of the leg work using templates

256
00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:54.600
and then working their work with experience and repetition

257
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:57.000
to know how to contextualize those examples

258
00:08:57.000 --> 00:08:59.560
to particular businesses or use cases.

259
00:08:59.560 --> 00:09:02.560
If I don't care about celebrity on any kind of short term,

260
00:09:02.560 --> 00:09:04.800
then I'm going to just increase the factionalization

261
00:09:04.800 --> 00:09:08.960
of access over time so that I can still,

262
00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:10.760
basically make even more the benefit

263
00:09:10.760 --> 00:09:14.680
of lots of customers without the cost of lots of headcount.

264
00:09:14.680 --> 00:09:18.000
So just a thought that I've had in thinking about lots

265
00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:20.120
of education and really knowledge,

266
00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:21.720
not even education, just knowledge-based businesses,

267
00:09:21.720 --> 00:09:25.480
which be fair, a lot of service businesses fundamentally

268
00:09:25.480 --> 00:09:27.240
exist based on somebody knowing how to do something

269
00:09:27.240 --> 00:09:28.320
and somebody else doesn't.

270
00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:30.040
And I think that those are three different paths

271
00:09:30.040 --> 00:09:32.040
that you can consider when scaling

272
00:09:32.040 --> 00:09:33.600
and the pros and cons of each.

273
00:09:33.600 --> 00:09:35.360
I think the reason that a lot of people don't do

274
00:09:35.360 --> 00:09:36.920
the kind of like the firm path,

275
00:09:36.920 --> 00:09:38.680
which is like, I'll have junior analysts

276
00:09:38.720 --> 00:09:40.560
and then I'll have senior analysts and VPs

277
00:09:40.560 --> 00:09:43.000
and moving around is that you have to have a brand

278
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:45.600
to attract intelligent people and a lot of people don't.

279
00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:46.960
And you also have to have an incentive structure

280
00:09:46.960 --> 00:09:48.800
that encourages them to want to stay over the long haul

281
00:09:48.800 --> 00:09:50.200
because people who are really intelligent

282
00:09:50.200 --> 00:09:51.640
are thinking five years ahead.

283
00:09:51.640 --> 00:09:53.240
They're thinking, what is this going to do for my career?

284
00:09:53.240 --> 00:09:54.520
If you have no path for them,

285
00:09:54.520 --> 00:09:56.920
be like, you're just a coach at my company.

286
00:09:56.920 --> 00:09:57.920
I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

287
00:09:57.920 --> 00:09:59.640
It's just like there's not a lot of progression there.

288
00:09:59.640 --> 00:10:01.520
Maybe you can see your coach, okay.

289
00:10:01.520 --> 00:10:04.640
But it's just more difficult to attract that level of talent

290
00:10:04.640 --> 00:10:06.240
and create an opportunity that's big enough

291
00:10:06.240 --> 00:10:07.960
that they will want to join on

292
00:10:07.960 --> 00:10:10.200
and be willing to commit to learning the skill set

293
00:10:10.200 --> 00:10:12.120
at a much deeper level than just like,

294
00:10:12.120 --> 00:10:13.720
hey, we have a one week on boarding

295
00:10:13.720 --> 00:10:16.480
and then we're just gonna fill up your roster, right?

296
00:10:16.480 --> 00:10:18.200
Like if you're talking in rosters,

297
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:21.200
it might not be the level of person that you want.

298
00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:23.320
And they're probably actually delivering

299
00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:26.200
watered down milk rather than fractionalized delicious.
